This past week I met up with Emma Dietrich from FPAN and talked about fixing the low-resolution problem I was having last week. Emma also brought the plastic replicas from the original test set so I could compare them to resin, as well as the actual artifacts that I will capture in 3D and print.
The plastic models were left on
their support structure to help me better understand the post processing that
goes into cleaning the models after they print while also having another aspect
that I could compare between the two printing methods. Once I properly clean
the support structures off I will be able to compare the two sets more fully,
however initially the plastic prints look much better than I anticipated and do
not bare strong layer lines which is traditionally associated with FDM prints.
The plastic prints are also lighter and printed in a fourth of the time it
takes to print their resin counter parts. While I will wait until I can compare
them more fully next week, there was already an initial problem with the tip of
the arrowhead pictured below. The plastic tip seems to be thinned, hallowed,
and appears as if it isn’t complete. This could be a problem during the
printing process, a limitation of FDM, or perhaps damage the model sustained
after printing. Ill be sure to reach out to see if holding sharp points on FDM
is normally an issue.
I went ahead and started capturing one of the arrow heads and
by the time of writing this blog I realized a mistake I made that I will go
ahead and display here. So far the model looked great but I failed to take enough
pictures on a particular side of the model and it left a dead space of data.
This tells me that I need to go back and capture more photos from this angle to
fix this problem. However, getting the model to this point did not take long at
all due to the time I spent previously working in the program.
No comments:
Post a Comment